AI governance

If it supports compatible standards, stronger institutions and wider tech access, it could reduce some costs of adoption

Signatories include key personnel from Anthropic, Meta and OpenAI

Their focus depends not only on ambition, but also on resource realities and institutional maturity

Leaders can apply ‘abundance test’ to clarify where the technology should be applied

Competitive advantage belongs to companies that can sustain, govern and defend the tech

Applying the ‘3R’ perspectives of return, risk and responsibility

Racing to capture upside should not ignore external costs

Frontier and agentic systems present escalating risks, where gains are ‘not automatic’

Such companies are often young and founder-led